Jump to content

BushXM15

Silver Patron
  • Content Count

    8,900
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

BushXM15 last won the day on August 8

BushXM15 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

782 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Location
    Where ever I am
  • State and Country Flags
    Idaho

Profile Fields

  • Interests
    Reloading Shooting Hunting Flying design composite construction

Recent Profile Visitors

1,248 profile views
  1. BushXM15

    ATTN: Oh Ye of Little or NO faith

    Just LOOK at the LOONY Tune Presidential candidates and what their proposing , by comparison this is chicken fodder !. IMO : Someone needs to have Warren & Sanders EMPTY SKULLS EXAMINED , talk about UNFIT for ANY public office !. The Irony and Hypocrisy of politicians lecturing WE THE PEOPLE on income equality ??? , while owning Multiple Multi Million dollar homes let alone everything else is INSULTING !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  2. BushXM15

    I'm an Armchair mechanic

    I pulled the cable out of MY old recliner ,which was Huge Oversized ( MY ankles DIDN'T hang over the foot rest ) and realized with a stiffer spring and spring latch release ; I eliminated the cable pull release . As MY handle was a flush pull right side release and when it broke IT BROKE . So I fixed it with out cable or pull . Sit down tap the footrest lean back UP POPS the footrest . When you wanted to go down with the footrest ,admittedly you had to put some down force on it ; It was like reverse Crunches . Wife said New House NEW FURNITURE , WE left everything other than what I'd made out of exotic woods .
  3. BushXM15

    Far worse than I imagined #5 Year Confiscation

    It's an outright violation of several constitutional /Bill of Rights statues !!!. 2 Nd. , 4 Th. ,5 Th. 7 Th. ?? as it violates Federal law and 14 Th. to name but #4 and possibly #5
  4. Oh Ye of Little or NO faith : This is what's REALLY Pissing off the dimwitted ones and Exactly WHY He needs OUR SUPPORT Fairfax, VA – -(Ammoland.com)- Last Friday, President Trump took the historic step of ordering the “unsigning” of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty during his address to the NRA-ILA’s Leadership Forum. President Trump’s action effectively withdraws the United States from the most comprehensive effort towards international gun control. Much of the intervening coverage on the ATT has focused on how the treaty did or did not constrain U.S. arms sales abroad, but many average law-abiding gun owners may be questioning how the treaty could or couldn’t have affected them. NRA’s complaints regarding the treaty have always been based on its potential effect on law-abiding American gun owners. Those complaints have focused on the treaty’s requirements for end use verification, its sometimes-unintelligible vagueness, its ability to be amended without the consensus of all parties, and its proponents repeated refusals to clarify that it has no effect on the possession of small arms by civilians in the United States. The treaty urges record keeping of end users, directing importing countries to provide information to an exporting country regarding arms transfers, including “end use or end user documentation” for a “minimum of ten years.” Each country is to “take measures, pursuant to its national laws, to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction for conventional arms.” Data kept on the end users of imported firearms is a de-facto registry of law-abiding firearms owners, which is a violation of federal law. Even worse, the ATT could be construed to require such a registry to be made available to foreign governments. The vagueness of the treaty and its ease of being “amended” is best exemplified by actions that took place at a conference on the treaty last year. At that conference, proponents of the treaty “welcome[ed]” several living documents into the ATT. While seemingly innocuous on its face, this change incorporated the International Small Arms Control Standards (ISACS) into the ATT. Falsely described as established “international standards” or “international norms” that “provide clear, practical and comprehensive guidance to practitioners and policymakers on fundamental aspects of small arms and light weapons control”, the ISACS are in reality a series of six standards developed by the UN for states to use in implementing their global disarmament agenda. Series 3 – Legislative and Regulatory – and its Module 3.30, “National Regulation of Civilian Access to Small Arms and Light Weapons,” is the most alarming of all the ISACS. Purporting to set the standards for “National Regulation of Civilian Access to Small Arms and Light Weapons,” Module 3.30 creates a means to almost entirely limit civilian access to small arms under the guise of International Humanitarian Law, International Human Rights Law, and Gender Based Violence. Highlights include, but are not limited to; a ban on civilian possession of “military” style arms – no automatic weapons or magazines with over a 10 round capacity, ballistic recordings, different risk classifications on types of firearms (i.e. calibers over .45 are an intolerable risk to public safety and semi-auto handguns and rifles are high risk), licensing and registration of all firearms, training and storage restrictions, waiting periods, 20-year record retention requirements of sellers, age limits and requiring a demonstrated need to possess a firearm, with self-defense not being one of them. While incorporation by reference of the ISACS into the ATT was alarming, it was also not entirely unpredictable. As with every anti-firearm UN initiative, concern must never lie entirely with what is in it now, but with what it will become and how it will be used by a future U.S. administration, especially one seeking international justification for a gun control agenda. Perhaps the easiest way to understand the future danger the ATT posed to U.S. gun owners is the complete refusal by proponents of the treaty to limit its application to civilian arms. NRA and other opponents of the treaty repeatedly asked for a carve-out in the treaty, yet those requests were flatly denied. If the treaty’s proponents had no intention of limiting American gun ownership, why resist such a limitation to the text of the treaty? Instead, the treaty included language in its preamble that treaty parties be “mindful of the legitimate trade and lawful ownership, and use of certain conventional arms for recreational, cultural, historical, and sporting activities, where such trade, ownership and use are permitted or protected by law.” A careful read will show that the use of arms for individual and collective defense is notably missing from this statement, and the statement creates no limitation and is really only an aspirational provision. Please join us in thanking President Trump for protecting our firearms freedoms by removing any obligation of the United States to be bound by the “object and purpose” of the Arms Trade Treaty.
  5. The Stats tell the Story !. Dimwitted ones continue their lies for political favor ,as well as an attempt of Power Grab : U.S.A. –-(Ammoland.com)- We all want to protect our family and friends. Gun-Control is the theory that disarming honest people will stop violent criminals. That is a fantastic theory, but does gun-control work in practice? Now that we have newly released FBI crime data at hand, we don’t have to guess if gun-control reduces violent crime. The answers might surprise you as we look from coast to coast. Does gun control save lives or cost them? The gun-control laws in Los Angeles are extreme. You won’t get a permit to carry a handgun in public unless you are a judge or a politician. You have to be over 21 years old to buy a rifle. You also need to show a state firearms safety card and to pass a background check each time you buy ammunition. Those regulations prevent many honest citizens from having a firearm for self-defense. How well did those gun-control laws work at stopping violent crime in Los Angeles? The rate of violent crime in LA is more than twice the national average. (748/369 per 100 thousand) Seattle gun-control laws are quite strict. Firearms purchases are taxed. You must to go through a background check to buy a firearm and you can’t loan a gun to a friend even if your friend already owns other firearms. People under 21 years of age may not buy many types of rifles. The police can seize your guns if you’re alleged to be a danger to yourself or to others. In addition, firearms have to be locked away when they are not in use. How well did those gun-control laws work at stopping violent crime? The rate of violent crime in Seattle is 84 percent above the national average. (680/369 per 100 thousand) The gun-control laws in Chicago are intimidating. The regulatory hurdles to buy a gun, and to get a concealed carry permit, are among the most expensive and lengthy in the nation. Chicago outlaws the ownership of certain types of rifles and has effectively banned gun ranges in the city. Chicago has mandatory waiting periods, so residents who obey the law have to wait an extraordinarily long time between when they ask permission to buy a gun and when they may finally take possession of that firearm. The purchase of ammunition is also strictly regulated. How well did those gun-control laws work at stopping violent crime? The rate of violent crime in Chicago is almost three times higher than the national average. (1006/369 per 100 thousand) In addition to state laws, New York City has its own burdensome gun laws. The licencing application to buy a long gun or handgun runs over a dozen pages and required a criminal background check. Owning a handgun requires a purchase permit as well as a state and city license. The application process takes from three to six months and requires a personal interview. You need a different permit if you want to have your firearm stored at your home or at your business. You need a separate permit if you want to store your firearm at a residence outside the city. Those permits do not allow you to have your legally owned firearm available for use as you travel to and from work or between your homes. New York also restricts the type of rifles you may own. They restrict the amount of ammunition your firearms may hold. New York also has so called “red flag” gun-control laws, so school officials, members of law enforcement, or members of your family can ask the court to block you from buying or owning firearms without you being present or represented at the hearing. These regulations don’t stop criminals since the rate of violent crime in New York City is 66 percent higher than the national average. (614/369 per 100 thousand) Baltimore’s gun-control laws are extremely strict. They require mandatory background checks when firearms are transferred. A safety course and purchase permit is required to buy a handgun. Mental health professionals, law enforcement officers, or a family member can ask for a protective order to disarm a gun owner without the gun owner being present at the legal proceedings. Many firearms are in a restricted category so that law abiding gun owners may only purchase one gun a month. The state also has a registry of all handgun owners. Baltimore denies concealed carry permits to ordinary citizens so you are effectively disarmed in public. The state also restricts the type of rifles you may own, and the amount of ammunition that firearms may hold. These laws fail to reduce crime since the crime rate for Baltimore is almost five times the national average. (1833/369 per 100 thousand) With over 300 murders in 2018, Baltimore politicians called for more of the same. The gun-control laws in Trenton NJ prevent many honest people from owning guns. You need a state permit to buy any firearm, and this permit takes months or years to obtain. New Jersey denies ordinary citizens the right to carry a firearm in public. The state also keeps a record of all registered handgun owners. The type of long guns you may own is restricted as is the ammunition capacity of all firearms. A judge may issue a restraining order to confiscate your firearms without you being present or represented. How well do those gun-control laws work at stopping violent crime in Trenton, New Jersey? The rate of violent crime in Trenton is more than three times higher than the national average. (1161/369 per 100 thousand) The gun-control laws in Boston deeply restrict the rights of law abiding people to own and use firearms for self-defense. The city requires a permit to purchase either a long gun or a handgun. It also requires a license to own the firearm. Law enforcement officers have denied these permits saying that the citizen did not have a justified reason to own a firearm. Boston police may also refuse to issue concealed carry permits to citizens with a clean criminal record. The type of long guns you may own is restricted as is the ammunition capacity of all firearms. A judge may issue an order to confiscate your firearms without you being present or represented. How well do those gun-control laws work at stopping violent crime in Boston? The rate of violent crime is about 70 percent higher than the national average. (622/369 per 100 thousand) We’ve looked at city after city, and the evidence is clear. Gun-control laws do not make us safer. In fact, these laws put honest citizens in greater danger from violent crime. I found this data with a few hours of study so any honest journalist could have tested the theory of gun-control..if they wanted to know the truth. Gun-control is getting us killed. The sad news is that politicians will continue to call for gun-control as long as it gets them elected. Fortunately, we can put a stop to that. Please Be Safe
  6. Yep looks like Supreme Court , NRA as well as ACLU will need too take a Croquet mallet too that AHole masquerading as Gov. Kommyfornia and send his testicles on a Mars orbit . Imagine someone disagrees with Your political views and seeks a restraining order ,LEO confiscates ALL YOUR weapons and YOU have a over capacity magazine or some other banned item even if it's a collectible Your Weapons are HISTORY !. Fines Jail Felony conviction ?!. Bank on it in KOMMYFORNIA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Before the Un Civil war breaks out !. Basically ANYONE can file a Restraining order on anyone else without due process or evidence ,therefore appointing LEO Judge Jury and EXECUTIONER !. See what happens when party of dimwitted ones are allowed to hold public office !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. I now for sure see WAR COMING !!!. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/13/ca-democrats-expand-red-flag-law-again-lengthen-confiscatory-period/ CA Democrats Expand Red Flag Law Again, Lengthen Confiscatory Period Democrats expanded California’s Red Flag Law again by lengthening the confiscatory period and broadening the number of people who can push for confiscation to begin with. California’s Red Flag statute is referred to as a Gun Violence Restraining Order. The orders were adopted in 2016, after being pushed as a means of temporarily taking guns away from dangerous people. The confiscatory period was one year when the orders first became law, but the Associated Press reports that Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed a bill Friday that allows the confiscatory period to expand to five years. Moreover, the bill signed by Newsom allows “employers, co-workers and teachers to seek gun violence restraining orders against other people.” Gun Violence Restraining Orders originally only allowed family members to seek confiscatory orders against an individual. The lengthening of the confiscatory period and the broadening of those who can seek is at least the third expansion of California’s Red Flag Law in as many years. For example, in late 2018, California Democrat lawmakers complained that not enough family members were availing themselves of the confiscatory law. On September 19, 2018, the Los Angeles Times reported that Los Angeles City Atty. Mike Feuer wanted a public campaign to encourage more people to pursue such orders against family members. Democrat lawmakers responded to Feuer and others by putting forward changes making it easier to get an order to confiscate guns from an individual. On September 29, 2018, Reuters reported that Gov. Brown signed the changes. On January 1, 2019, changes took effect that broadened California’s confiscatory law so as to include ammunition and certain magazines. KRCR reported that the changes “[add] ammunition and bullet drums to the list of items related to firearms that can be confiscated.”
  7. Congratulations to a CHAMPION Simone Biles has WON another World Championship in Gymnastics Tally #25 Metals MOST EVER Biles dazzles on floor to win record 25th world championship medal https://wibqam.com/news/articles/2019/oct/13/american-biles-wins-record-24th-medal-at-worlds/946702/?refer-section=sports https://www.fox16.com/sports/simone-biles-wins-vault-to-tie-worlds-medal-record/
  8. BushXM15

    Good Morning!

    Nope it's still AFTERNOON
  9. BushXM15

    Good Morning!

    Afternoon AGAIN I'm making a run on the Apple Ladies Orchard and will Return after a bit ,she's been hard to pin down and Saturday seems to be Prime Time .
  10. BushXM15

    Blackouts

    There are SEVERAL ways of Fraudulent voting TT and YOU KNOW that !. Kommyfornia requires NO PHOTO ID and when one is dealing with Millions of Illegal Aliens the odds are stacked in favor of democrap party enabler's by REGISTERING THEM . In San Diego County I knew of SEVERAL Illegal ( some Green card but none the less ineligible to Own a firearm or vote ) but they managed by simply showing up with an address on a utility bill !. An of course there's the slick ones whom have #17 aliases and MULTIPLE addresses ,in several counties . I KNOW this because of Sheriff's Deputies asking the whereabouts or IF I'd seen any of them ; Over the many Years of owning sizable land parcels and " Illegals Squatting " on Private property !. Of which neither the State nor the County would involve themselves in resolving !. Didn't really become to problematic UNTIL WILDFIRES became mainstream and origins were unattended cooking campfires !. Here's a twisted Irony a CLOSE Friend and fellow property owner #4 parcels away from MY property . Hans Kept his property immaculate . He and his Wife had a STUNNING Home Built in 1998 -2000 , I mean Absolutely FABULOUS , Under sub floor fully finished basement 6 K sq. ft. for Antique Car collection . Another Huge Metal building for restoring AirStream Trailers and parking his Trucks in . Groomed Avocado trees weeds near eradicated. His Perimeter property edges along roadways mowed or tilled ( Fire prevention ) . Illegals squatting between His property and another Mans property whom DIDN'T keep up his property ( which was Hispanic himself ) had party's there loud music drinking trash thrown over fences . I'm sure You're getting the picture ,They DIDN'T get along at all . So Francisco allowed a number of illegals too CAMP out in a ravine between his property and Han's property . It Actually Belonged too Han's as it was rugged and UN- fenced along about 200 yd. . Anyway Han's tried several times to have County Health Dept. EVICT those transients ,even PAID to resurvey that portion of his property so as to Certify it was Legally his . After several years of going back and forth Han's gave up and decided with all the NONSENSE CA. was pulling and Water rationing killing his Avocado Business , They were going too move . Fast forward 2014 Han's had a Mysterious fire along two fronts of his property . Local FD put it out and #3 months later sent Han's a BILL FOR $ 18,000.00 , as the " ORIGIN OF THOSE FIRES WERE ON HIS PROPERTY " !. So Han's and Brigitte Sold their place too an Englishman and his Wife . The man immediately had a Dosser tear up everything possible around the perimeter and had HOT WIRE added too the Fence which was completed about a year before WE moved . I remember the County inspector came out and raised some stink about clearing that land and NOT posting the fence line as Electric fence . I was standing there along with Han's who had come back to haul off another Air Stream , when that Inspector Told the Englishman it Violated Code . He looked at the inspector and said WTH are you talking about Cattle CAN'T read man are you daft !. I'm putting in # 250 head of Angus and some other cross do you have any Idea as to what expenditure that requires !. Just Before WE left Francisco had a FOR SALE Sign on his House . An TT here's the real KICKER ; People all over the neighborhood were up in arms as too the # of cattle proposed , However they forgot ONE small item !. The Man whom owned that property previously Doug a retired Colonel and also a GOOD friend of mine , Had tried to RE ZONE his parcel prior to selling it too Han's and the VERY SAME NEIGHBORS had DENIED it through petition with the County Several months back now one of our former neighbors which we stay in contact with , called to inform us of a death of another neighbor . So While talking with Dean I asked about the CATTLE RANCH . He laughed so hard I was worried about him . He Told ME that Reginald the Englishman had succeeded in basically FORCING # 3 Neighbors into SELLING THEIR HOMES and had by Proxy ACTUALLY BOUGHT Fransisco's PROPERTY BELOW MARKET VALUE , as that Straw buy KNEW OF THE CATTLE COMING IN . So I asked Dean about the Cattle and he said Bush there are NO CATTLE !. I said wait a minute and he told Me Reggie had HIRED a Cattle Trucking outfit ,whom DELIVERED about #40 Head and He watered and grazed them for a week ,all the While telling everyone the rest were in transit . Dean said FOR SALES SIGNS FLEW UP AROUND THE NEIGHBORHOOD almost as fast as We had moved Reggie and his Wife had some type of Flowers put in probably Wax and Proteas . Man I Love that Reggie one smart Son of a Gun !. An as they had MONEY he was probably used to getting his way . I Know Han's got $1.6 Million for their home and property . Dean says the neighborhood is TRANQUIL like before the people across from us moved in . That's another story !.
  11. It's coming too SOCIALISM and Eventually COMMUNISM IF democrap retards are allowed to continue in political theater !. Do You know the difference between Socialism and Communism ?. Socialism is involuntary Citizens participation in a Closed Government program . Communism is Government FORCED Citizen participation ,as in Hong Kong with NO weapons of resistance . An either way individual freedoms ,along with any form of Rights or Constitution are LOST FOREVER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. Fug em and the corrupt slime accompanying them !.
  12. BushXM15

    Little Videos

    Why You SOB pee in my pool will you How do you get these to embed again ? http://i.imgur.com/sgP5DMc.mp4
  13. BushXM15

    Yesterday it was 70 degrees

    Well might have been 70 a couple of days ago but I had to break out a long sleeve shirt this AM !.
  14. We DID Brother into the other Free State Idaho , I DIDN'T want to be another Kommyfornian moving into Texas or Arizona ; As MOST of our Conservative 2 Nd. amendment FRIENDS have
×