Jump to content

Rampy

Silver Patron
  • Content Count

    37,894
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    48

Rampy last won the day on April 9

Rampy had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,379 Excellent

About Rampy

  • Rank
    Recusant Sexy Beast

Profile Information

  • Location
    Peaceful Wild West.......
  • State and Country Flags
    Israel

Recent Profile Visitors

3,715 profile views
  1. https://www.firearmspolicy.org/save-the-braces?fbclid=IwAR0oU7FFYk6epUe01n9BtcTMn74QmNCDGhdbsQZCdWZ4bZ1vp9ZcZmliViY REMEMBER: The more unique comments and different arguments the ATF receives, the more they will have to read and respond to (this is good)! Read all instructions on the docket carefully, ATF is looking for reasons to exclude your comments. FPC will post requirements when they are made public. All submissions received should include the agency name and docket number (ATF 2021R-08) for this notice of proposed rulemaking. Requirements can be viewed in section VII. Public Participation. According to the ATF: "All comments should reference this document's docket number ATF 2021R-08, be legible, and include the commenter's complete first and last name and full mailing address. ATF may not consider, or respond to, comments that do not meet these requirements or comments containing excessive profanity." Important Instructions: This proposed rule is a separate action from the Notice on the Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with “Stabilizing Braces” published on December 18, 2020 and withdrawn on December 31, 2020. No comments received under the withdrawn notice were considered for this proposed rule, and no comments received pursuant to that notice will be considered as part of this proposed rule. Commenters will need to submit new comments in connection with this proposed rule. In plain English, the above means if you commented against ATF brace bans in December of 2020, your comments will not be considered. You will need to submit again.
  2. https://www.firearmspolicy.org/save-the-braces?fbclid=IwAR0oU7FFYk6epUe01n9BtcTMn74QmNCDGhdbsQZCdWZ4bZ1vp9ZcZmliViY REMEMBER: The more unique comments and different arguments the ATF receives, the more they will have to read and respond to (this is good)! Read all instructions on the docket carefully, ATF is looking for reasons to exclude your comments. FPC will post requirements when they are made public. All submissions received should include the agency name and docket number (ATF 2021R-08) for this notice of proposed rulemaking. Requirements can be viewed in section VII. Public Participation. According to the ATF: "All comments should reference this document's docket number ATF 2021R-08, be legible, and include the commenter's complete first and last name and full mailing address. ATF may not consider, or respond to, comments that do not meet these requirements or comments containing excessive profanity." Important Instructions: This proposed rule is a separate action from the Notice on the Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with “Stabilizing Braces” published on December 18, 2020 and withdrawn on December 31, 2020. No comments received under the withdrawn notice were considered for this proposed rule, and no comments received pursuant to that notice will be considered as part of this proposed rule. Commenters will need to submit new comments in connection with this proposed rule. In plain English, the above means if you commented against ATF brace bans in December of 2020, your comments will not be considered. You will need to submit again.
  3. ATFE want to amend Congressional language in 18 USC 921 and re-define what a ‘firearm’ is. This is due to specific language in the US Code, identifying the receiver as the portion of a gun with both barrel and trigger. As AR-15s have a split design, it does not technically meet the definition of ‘firearm’. This has led to the BATFE dropping several cases against unlicensed gun manufacturers because at no point was a firearm– as described in US Code– ever produced. The BATFE also seeks to include kits like the Polymer 80 or Ghost Guns CNC machines as ‘readily convertible’ firearms that need serialization and background checks. The Department of Justice (“Department”) proposes amending Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”) regulations to provide new regulatory definitions of “firearm frame or receiver” and “frame or receiver” because the current regulations fail to capture the full meaning of those terms. The Department also proposes amending ATF's definitions of “firearm” and “gunsmith” to clarify the meaning of those terms, and to provide definitions of terms such as “complete weapon,” “complete muffler or silencer device,” “privately made firearm,” and “readily” for purposes of clarity given advancements in firearms technology. Further, the Department proposes amendments to ATF's regulations on marking and recordkeeping that are necessary to implement these new or amended definitions. https://www.regulations.gov/document/ATF-2021-0001-0001?fbclid=IwAR09xpMDfzyFbm4eD6H8IaBDNcwnRsDOGzrTSDy0RnWr_HHn6OhHj_dwG_A
  4. Link is live for comments https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/factoring-criteria-firearms-attached-stabilizing-braces?fbclid=IwAR23U45eqTBPdLMDCgSHCCvPnwSH3ep-E3hNYtg-IKAoil6hEwjCt1o-9Co
  5. https://www.regulations.gov/document/ATF-2021-0001-0001?fbclid=IwAR09xpMDfzyFbm4eD6H8IaBDNcwnRsDOGzrTSDy0RnWr_HHn6OhHj_dwG_A Link above is how the ATF plans on changing the definition of firearms while ignoring federal law This is part of the form.......and it's set up so you are wrong and the pistol is really a SBR........
  6. Really a shame & he retired not that long ago
  7. The libs are loosing their mind and calling judge Benitez a communist, a marxist & no surprise a fascist while calling for his death and even worse......... Even the governor of kalif made personal attacks against the Judge and is acting like a 5 year old throwing a temper tantrum....... Shows how ignorant liberals are & that they have no idea what the judges background is, what it is to actually follow the law and the constitution & how far gone they actually are....... Now the questions is, once this is appealed and goes to the 9th circuit what will they do......if anything due to all the death threats against the judge & how the libs are intimidating the 9th circuit.....
  8. You are assuming I've got the attention span to watch all of that video
  9. Except I tried apologizing and walking away, and yet here comes the little snitch pugsley sniffing and shatting and pretending to be innocent and the victim & refusing to let it go, I waked away till the c** sucking coward opened up his cock holster again since he can not pretend to be a man and walk away.
  10. Did you also show him where you threatened me......and that you were going to track me down and show up if I did not meet you......that is stalking, you threatened to show up un invited and have a past history here of threatening to punch me.... So you lied and changed your story pretending to be the vic here, like you are little Mr innocent after I hurt your feelings over a post some time back, did you also tell them where you said you knew you had broken stalking laws and refused to post a picture of your face, or where you were going or when, or how about what you were driving.... You refused saying you were afraid I would have you arrested....but what could you be afraid of, unless you knew you were threatening me and stalking me. So you rn to your sheriff....snitch.....lying snitch actually......... Just cant stop eh, keep on talking shat, nothing like having a grudge and refusing to let it go. Time for you to grow up pugs, hell, your not even man enough to post your name here, yet you make up lies and play the victim instead of being man enough to stand up and admit what you have posted in the past. So you also now admit to stalking my old posts, looking up what I have posted, but yet I'm the one that's a wacko nutjob....... You ain't nothing but a freaking lying snitch.......
  11. That's all you got Are you going to pull a pugs and snitch me out like he did to the cops also So now we not only have 1 snitch here, but working on 2 snitches.......
  12. The term “Ghost gun” originally came about by politicians when they were saying a gun could pass thru metal detectors if I remember correctly..... And it scares the general public and helps them believe the media/political lies....
  13. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9454603/Biden-ATF-nominee-anti-gun-lobbyist-Waco-lied-cult-shooting-helicopters.html
×
×
  • Create New...